Chember efficiencies

Tom Jenkins (JENKINS@CWAPHY.PHYS.CWRU.EDU)
Fri, 12 Jan 1996 15:49:11 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: MICHAEL J. LONGO: "Comments on Rtwiddle"
Previous message: Tom Jenkins: "Alignment numbers for run 1056 and beyond"

I have run my chamber efficiency program using the new alignment numbers. Using
run 1056, things look O.K. except the first stand of nanometrics. I would
recommend that chambers 105, 106,107,108 all be set at 2900 volts. One Michigan
chambers is weak. The voltage on chamber 112 should probably go to 2950.
More details are on ~tlj/run_anal/R1056.WLS. Don't worry about the bad spots in
122 and 124, I don't think the wire swaps worked.

Gotta go.

Tom

Next message: MICHAEL J. LONGO: "Comments on Rtwiddle"
Previous message: Tom Jenkins: "Alignment numbers for run 1056 and beyond"