Alignment numbers for run 1056 and beyond

Tom Jenkins (JENKINS@CWAPHY.PHYS.CWRU.EDU)
Fri, 12 Jan 1996 15:14:56 -0500 (EST)

I have used run 1056 to determine the alignment constants for the new setup.
Here they are:

-1.0504 3.097 11.935 123.69 101
-2.3343 10.387 11.302 126.57 102
-0.7854 1.130 11.103 129.69 103
-2.5781 12.004 9.476 132.57 104
-2.3191 10.213 11.126 135.69 105
-0.5365 1.073 9.368 138.69 106
-2.0852 10.275 11.907 141.69 107
0.8062 1.424 1.985 144.69 108
0.7933 1.735 2.611 167.09 109
-2.1118 10.126 12.345 169.89 110
-2.3451 10.987 11.719 172.84 111
0.5665 1.527 3.503 176.09 112
-2.3506 11.182 11.764 178.84 113
-2.5207 12.325 10.736 181.84 114
-2.3541 11.375 11.763 185.09 115
0.9568 3.284 1.613 189.65 116
-2.3490 11.505 11.939 194.29 117
-2.2340 11.207 12.405 197.29 118
0.7851 2.683 2.833 200.29 119
-2.4694 12.490 11.257 203.29 120
-2.3633 11.885 11.943 206.16 121
1.0277 3.374 1.433 209.16 122
0.7530 2.942 2.849 212.41 123
0.6109 2.449 3.518 215.41 124

(also available as the file ~tlj/run_anal/GEOMETRY2.TXT on fnalu)

I am in the process of trying to determine efficiencies for that run but I am
having a little problem linking the new unpacker. I seem to be getting the old
message about wire swaps, etc. Stay tuned.

Tom